![]() |
Office of Regulatory AffairsINSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) |
|||||||
|
|
Overview of Research with Human Subjects in the Social and Behavioral SciencesIn deciding what must be reviewed, what type of review is appropriate, and who will conduct the review, there are a number of questions to be asked:
Does the project meet the definition of research with human subjects? The definition of research with human subjects is as follows: "Research means a systematic investigation, including research development, testing and evaluation designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge."A human subject is a living individual about whom an investigator, (whether professional or student) obtains data through an interaction with the individual or obtains identifiable private information. The intention to contribute to such knowledge is key to the definition, whether or not the completed research does make such a contribution or is accepted for publication. All of the following activities may be included in the definition:
According to Georgetown's policies, such research must be reviewed by the IRB-c in advance of any involvement of human subjects. This includes research conducted at another institution in this country or research conducted abroad. It includes collaboration with investigators at other institutions, and it includes research in which other institutions or researchers gather the data for a Georgetown researcher. (The type of review for such projects is not limited. They may be determined to be exempt if the eligibility criteria are met.) There are several categories of protected subjects.
Does the research involve deception? All research involving deception of subjects must be reviewed by the full IRB-c. Much of the research in the social and behavioral sciences has no more than minimal risk. The greatest risk is often a breach of confidentiality, when such a breach could result in social stigma, loss of employment, legal prosecution, embarrassment, damaged family relationships, and sometimes physical danger. Research asking subjects to relive or reveal violence perpetrated against them, such as sexual assault, may also carry emotional risks. The degree of risk must be no more than minimal in order for research to be determined to be exempt or considered eligible for expedited review. Research activities which may be determined to be exempt, provided there is no more than minimal risk, are listed in our IRB-c Manual and on our website. Activities eligible for expedited review, provided there is no more than minimal risk can be found in the IRB-c Manual and on our website. Who Does the Review? And When? Applications for determination of exemption may be submitted at any time for review and approval by the IRB-c Committee or the authorized person in the investigator's department or school. Review may be completed within two or three days. Requests for expedited review may be submitted at any time for review by the Chair of the IRB-c or a designee. The timing of the review depends upon the schedules of available reviewers. Requests for full review must be submitted in accordance with the posted submission deadline schedule. These upcoming dates are shown on the website at Change URL Last revised: November 13, 2001 |
IRB-C Quick Links:
|
||||||